AMD Threadripper 2970WX & 2920X Review > Price vs. Performance, Best Workstation CPUs - mosleythouldre

Price vs. Performance, Best Workstation CPUs

In front wrapping things up let's go over a few performance vs. Leontyne Price scatter plots which give us a good overview of where things stand, starting with Liquidiser. On the graph you want to be positioned as low every bit possible and as far to the right as possible, lower means cheaper and further right way faster.

The dispirited dots represent the Intel CPUs dependable, and easily, they're all higher and more to the left than the competition. The Threadripper 2920X despoiled the Essence i7-7820X for example, it also beats out the Core i9-9900K and in footing of value the first-gen TR 1920X destroys them whol.

Meanwhile the 2970WX is much cheaper and faster than the 7960X, so an easy win there. For those taking connected 3D rendering tasks the Threadripper serial is a must.

When it comes to video recording encryption we get more mixed results. The ultimate value laurels again goes to the TR 1920X, but the new 2920X while non as good value as the 1920X, it does work over out the Intel Core i7-7820X by a disenchanting gross profit margin and even edged out the 9900K.

The TR 2950X also does very well but unfortunately the 2970WX and 2990WX are underutilized and consume issues with encoding workloads, particularly on Windows 10. At to the lowest degree at the rattling high-oddment of things, Intel does come forbidden well on best for this eccentric of workload.

Margins when encoding with Premiere are far less brutal however, and while the 2990WX is worsened assess than the 7960X you could argue that the 2970WX isn't, offer fairish carrying into action for a much depress price. That said, the 2950X makes so much more sense as it's faster and cheaper. The new TR 2920X close to matched the 9900K and 7820X. The Intel CPUs were slightly better but it's a walk-to call up.

Closing Remarks

Just those graphs don't tell us everything roughly this compare in footing of valuate. Commonly AMD tends to catch Intel come out of the closet with improve motherboard prices on with the inclusion body of a decent enclosed cooler, but that's not the case with Threadripper. The cheapest X399 boards typically cost around $300 whereas X299 boards start at just under $200, this is a factor for those buying the mainstream CPUs on these platforms. For your 16-core+ CPUs you're probably looking at outlay concluded $400 along a motherboard for either platform. Neither Threadripper or Skylake-X CPUs go with a cooler, so you'rhenium looking at a similar disbursal there, too.

Where AMD currently has an reward is in the platform itself, they tender heaps of PCIe lanes, Error correction code remembering support and the ability to expand on the far side upright 18 cores. That last uncomparable is a self-aggrandizing one, especially when 3rd-gen Threadripper bequeath work the same boards, and then that MSI X399 Creation you spent $500 won't need to be tossed for a right smart amount of time yet.

But what to buy, and what CPUs make the most sense?

Starting with the Threadripper 2920X, IT has an MSRP of $650 which is substantially cheaper than the $800 the 1920X came in at. AMD's offering 12 cores for the price Intel will kick in you 8, you get basically 3x the L3 cache and just over doubly as many PCIe 3.0 lanes. There were just two tests where the 7820X beat the 2920X and that was unary-wind Cinebench and PCMark 10. For everything else AMD's new 12-substance Threadripper part wiped the knock down with the 7820X, information technology was basically a non-contest.

We didn't take in meter to retest the Core i9-7900X, but I can assure you with the information we have on manus the 2920X also dominates that part American Samoa well, mostly because the 10-essence Intel CPU costs over 40% more. That just leaves the 9900K, and frankly, if productiveness tasks are the centre then we believe the 2920X is the smarter buy. It wish land up costing a petty more overall just for applications that employ the 12-core Threadripper CPU well, a heavily overclocked 9900K will mellow trying to keep up.

Course, if you mostly want to courageous then the 9900K is a better choice... though we'd advocate you draw a blank the 9900K even exists -- countenance's be honest, right now IT doesn't -- and just get Intel's own 8700K, Oregon AMD's 2700X, your select.

We had nothing bad to say about the 2950X when it launched back in August and IT's the same story with the 2920X in late October. The only issue for the 2920X justly now is the first-gen TR 1920X sells for a little over $400, that's the open choice now and if I were in the market for a high-end desktop system that's what I'd be snapping up before shopworn runs dead.

Past we have the 24-kernel Threadripper 2970WX which is a 3D rendering beast, impartial like the 2990WX. Unfortunately right now Windows won't countenance you to get the most out of this processor, so it's non a Processor we recommend unless you're using Linux or you are certain it can smash its way through any workload you lack to throw at IT.

Boilersuit we see less reason to adorn in Intel's X299 platform. If AMD didn't have the steep-end desktop marketplace segment all stitched up last year, they certainly do now, seeing how Intel's remained mulish and won't become competitive on pricing (read our newspaper column on the substance).